Drawing for DIAPO

USPTO serial 79036981

DIAPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3712138Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 2009
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES MICHAEL FAIER

566 W. ADAMS ST.,SUITE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, namely, bath soap, face soap, toilet soap, skin soap, and hand soap; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, and dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Import of soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics; hair lotions; hair dyes; and dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution and packing for shipment of bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, cleaning, polishing, degreasing and scouring preparations, abrasive preparations, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 2, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 19, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 24, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 24, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 15, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 8, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance