Drawing for TYPHOON

USPTO serial 79036982

TYPHOON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3554266Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TYPHOON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter T. Holsen

PETER T. HOLSEN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SWALL, LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESUITE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal valves for petroleum applications, namely, metal valves not including machine elementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Valves being parts of petroleum production machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 3, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 31, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance