Drawing for HIGHLAND

USPTO serial 79037003

HIGHLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Purses, school bags, briefcases, traveling sets made of leatherware, valises, shopping bags, cattle skins, garment bags for travel, leather straps other than for clothing purpose, umbrellasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 19, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance