Drawing for OBDUCAT

USPTO serial 79037005

OBDUCAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3472440Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 22, 2008
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OBDUCAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electromechanical and/or hydraulic printing and embossing machines; machines for Nano Imprint Litography (NIL), Electron Beam Recorder (EBR) based lithography and printing plates; semiconductor manufacturing machines; semiconductor wafer processing machines and equipment; electronic integrated circuits manufacturing machines; machines for manufacturing recorded optical storage discs and/or recorded magnetic data carriers, storage discs and electronic memories; machines for manufacturing flat panel display screens, liquid crystal display screens and light emitting diode display screens; all intended for research and/or industrial purposesACTIVE—
009Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM); computer programs for control of Nano Imprint Lithography (NIL) and Electron Beam Recorder (EBR) machines and toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 13, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 21, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2007LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance