USPTO serial 79037011
CROFER 22 APU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3472441Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROFER 22 APU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. BRUCE HAMBURG
C. BRUCE HAMBURG JORDAN AND HAMBURG LLP122 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Sheets, strips, rods, wires, and pipes with cross-sections of all kinds, all goods made from alloys mainly containing iron and chromium and used in the manufacture of fuel cells | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electrical components being parts of fuel cells, namely, interconnecting electrical wires, plates, and contacts made from alloys mainly containing iron and chromium | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by VDM Metals GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CROFER 22 APU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |