USPTO serial 79037058
AQUABEADSART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUABEADSART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
Robert P. Michal Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue SouthNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Wax for skis; coin-operated amusement machines for use in amusement parks; toys for domestic pets; toys, namely, beads, bead templates, arts and crafts products for children for creating objects from beads consisting of beads and templates; dolls; go games; Japanese chess, namely, shogi games; dice; Japanese dice games, namely, sugoroku; dice cups; diamond games;chess games; checkers; conjuring apparatus, namely, magic tricks; dominoes; Japanese playing cards, namely, utagaruta; playing cards; Japanese playing cards, namely, Hanafuda; cards being part of trading card games; tarot cards; promotional game cards; mah-jong; game machines and apparatus, namely, stand alone video game machines, amusement game machines; billiard equipment, namely, billiard cue sticks, billiard tables, billiard balls, billiard nets, billiard chalk; sports equipment, namely, sport balls, javelins, starting blocks; fishing tackle; insect collecting implements, namely, toy butterfly nets, toy insect collecting houses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |