Drawing for NUÑEZ DE PRADO

USPTO serial 79037079

NUÑEZ DE PRADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445439Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUÑEZ DE PRADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean S. Swidler

Sean S. Swidler IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook Rd.Suite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oil, fried potatoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance