USPTO serial 79037100
SOLOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3554267Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2008
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical agents, namely, sprays, polishes, lotions, and gels, for impregnating textiles, furs and leather, non-wovens and fabrics; stain repellents of wax for repelling liquids and dirt on Napa leather, smooth leather, high gloss leather, Russian leather and waxed leathers, all for footwear, clothing and headgear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | preparations for removing pressure marks on shoes, namely, leather polishes and leather creams for softening the leather and therewith stretching the shoe; leather polishes in the form of gels and sprays; shining and polishing preparations for shoes and boots in the form of wax polishes, wax sprays, wax lotions, and wax gels; cleaning, polishing and scouring preparations and soaps, all for footwear, clothing and headgear, in particular shoe polishes, shoe soaps, shoe lotions, shoe sprays, shoe foam; polishing sprays, polishing gels, polishing creams and polishing soaps, leather polishes, leather lotions and leather soaps, shoe cream | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Shoe deodorants | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | shoe cleaning kit comprised of shoe sponges, shoe brushes, polishing gloves for shoes, and polishing cloths for shoes; non-electric shoe cleaning appliances, namely, shoe polish applicators not containing shoe polish; shoe-horns; shoe formers in the nature of shoe stretchers; shoe trees; bootjacks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schelchen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Schelchen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Schelchen GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SOLOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |