Drawing for CELLAVISTA

USPTO serial 79037107

CELLAVISTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398780Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CELLAVISTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific and measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, cell analyzersACTIVE—
010Medical instruments and apparatus, namely, cell analyzersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 20, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 30, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jan 30, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Jan 9, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 24, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance