Drawing for EMC

USPTO serial 79037123

EMC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591328Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EMC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEX R. SLUZAS

ALEX R. SLUZAS PAUL & PAUL1717 Arch StreetSuite 3740PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical mixing machines for the chemical, ceramic and metallurgic industries as well as for the building materials industry, in particular mixing machines for the carbon industry and for the aluminum industry; stirring machines and kneading machines for the chemical, ceramic and metallurgic industries as well as for the building materials industry; cut-off machines, pressing machines, granulating machines, reaction machines, emulating machines, disintegration machines, and conditioning machines for processing free flowing bulk materials, slurries, and sludges in continuous or discontinuous industrial processes in the chemical, ceramic and metallurgic industries as well as for the building materials industry; replacement parts for the aforementioned machines; electrically driven and pneumatically driven mechanical conveyors; replacement parts for the aforementioned conveyorsACTIVE—
009Dosage apparatus for bulk goods in solid and liquid form, namely, flow meters and flow regulators, and calibrating feeders for processing free flowing bulk materials, slurries, and sludges in continuous or discontinuous industrial processes in the chemical, ceramic and metallurgic industries as well as for the building materials industry; electric or electronic controls, namely, control hardware, in the nature of computers, programmable logic controllers, and computer software for controlling industrial machinery and pressure, temperature, and flow sensors; replacement parts for the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
011Homogenizing machines and autoclaves, namely, heaters, dryers and sterilization machines for the chemical, ceramic and metallurgic industries as well as for the building materials industry and parts of the aforementioned goods used thereforeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 5, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 26, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 24, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance