USPTO serial 79037149
BERG-LAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3508828Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERG-LAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Pipes made of metal, pipes made predominantly of metal, pipes having multi-layered walls that are primarily of metal, and metal line pipes for the transport of liquids, gases and solid-matter-containing media, namely, for use in gas pipelines, oil pipelines, drinking water pipelines, and pipelines for solid-matter containing media ] * PIPES HAVING MULTI-LAYERED WALLS, WHICH PIPES AND WALLS ARE MADE OF METAL OR PREDOMINANTLY OF METAL, FOR THE TRANSPORT OF LIQUIDS, GASES AND SOLID-MATTER-CONTAINING MEDIA, NAMELY, FOR USE IN GAS PIPELINES, OIL PIPELINES, DRINKING WATER PIPELINES, AND PIPELINES FOR SOLID-MATTER CONTAINING MEDIA * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Custom manufacture of pipes having single and multi-layered walls for third parties for the transport of liquids, gases, and solid-matter-containing media ] * CUSTOM MANUFACTURE FOR THIRD PARTIES OF PIPES HAVING MULTI-LAYERED, WALLS, WHICH PIPES AND WALLS ARE MADE OF METAL PREDOMINANTLY OF METAL, FOR THE TRANSPORT OF LIQUIDS, GASES, AND SOLID-MATTER-CONTAINING MEDIA, NAMELY, FOR USE IN GAS PIPELINES, OIL PIPELINES, DRINKING WATER PIPELINES, AND PIPELINES FOR SOLID-MATTER CONTAINING MEDIA * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by First Tube Intellectual Property Management Company of Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by Bergrohr GmbH Siegen
- Other trademarks owned by Bergrohr GmbH Siegen
- Other trademarks owned by Bergrohr GmbH Siegen
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named BERG-LAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |