USPTO serial 79037204
SILPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531139Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SILPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Transparent conductive films, namely, optically clear flexible plastic film For industrial use; gas barrier films for industrial use, phase difference films for industrial use, anit-reflection films for use on auto windows, anti-glare film for use on auto windows, plastic laminated film for use in home and on auto windows; plastic laminated sheets, namely, plastic laminated films for industrial use; plastic semi-worked products, namely, plastic semi-work films for use as insulators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Steel Chemical Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Steel Chemical Co. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by NIPPON STEEL Chemical & Material Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SILPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 9, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |