USPTO serial 79037220
MATRIXAUTHENTICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3512666Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MATRIXAUTHENTICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gloria Tsui-Yip
Gloria Tsui-Yip Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C.270 Madison Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer programs and software for processing, transmitting and receiving personal data and controlling access for use with security systems, namely, personal authentication and identification systems; Electronic machines and apparatus, namely, machines and apparatus for processing, transmitting and receiving personal data and controlling access for use with security systems and personal authentication or identification systems and their parts ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; Computer programming and maintenance of computer software; [ Rental of computers; ] Providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs, namely, programs for processing, transmitting and receiving personal data and for controlling access for security systems, personal identification or authentication systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSE Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MATRIXAUTHENTICATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |