USPTO serial 79037235
ICESAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3547003Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2008
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICESAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IS-155 Reykjavik, IS
IS-155 Reykjavik, IS
IS-155 Reykjavik, IS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE D. DICKOS
GEORGE D. DICKOS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON ET AL535 SMITHFIELD STREETHENRY W. OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial activities, namely, retail deposit account banking services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |