Drawing for PERFECTA

USPTO serial 79037310

PERFECTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505457Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Hetu

Jennifer M. Hetu Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Filling and packaging machines, and parts thereof, for filling packages, boxes, bags, envelopes, wrappings, pouches, and cartons with teasSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 23, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 15, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 24, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance