USPTO serial 79037327
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Sanitary and hygienic apparatus and equipment, sanitary products made of acrylate, bathtubs, tubs for collecting and disposing of shower water, shower trays and shower cubicles, equipment for bathrooms, shower screens for bathtubs, bathtubs with hydromassage, hydromassage systems, installations for bathrooms | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Insulating materials, sealants, non-metallic flexible pipes, sheets of acrylate polymer, jointing and sealing materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Plastic pots and tools for household and kitchen use, toilet fittings and accessories for bathrooms, rough, shaped and otherwise worked glass, hollow glass; glass with a special anti-lime deposit layer, not included in other classes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |