USPTO serial 79037331
IHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534238Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
Jeffrey H. Kaufman Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines and mechanical implements, namely, [ mowers, hay tedders, ] rakes, round balers, hay balers, and bale wrapping machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IHI Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IHI Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IHI Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ISHIKAWAJIMA-HARIMA HEAVY; INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named IHI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |