Drawing for DENTALOSCOPE

USPTO serial 79037362

DENTALOSCOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488839Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENTALOSCOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical apparatus and instruments, namely, cameras, disc drives, disc readers, optical scanners, monitors, infrared transmitters; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images, namely, cameras, microphones, sound recording apparatus; data-processing equipments, namely, data processors, processor units, central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Medical, dental and veterinary apparatus consisting of a system comprised of arrangements of optical lenses that allows doctors and surgeons to visually enlarge and observe areas of treatment or surgery, and to which a digital camera can be fixed in order to visualize and enlarge the image or film on a monitorSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering in the medical, dental and dental technology sector, namely, development and construction drafting of optical apparatus and instruments and of diagnostic apparatus for medical purposes; computer programmingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 12, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance