USPTO serial 79037372
L
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE D. DICKOS
GEORGE D. DICKOS KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON ET AL535 SMITHFIELD STHENRY W. OLIVER BUILDINGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial activities, namely, retail banking, arranging for loans and deposit account services, investment banking, corporate banking, security services, namely, guaranteeing loans, security brokerage, real estate lending services, equity capital investment, asset management and private banking services, assets under custody banking services, investor relations services, namely, advisory services relating to credit and debit control, investment, grants and financing of loans; corporate financial consultation, market making, namely, providing the quotes of both a buy and a sell price of financial instruments and securities, proprietary brokerage trading of financial instruments and securities, commercial financing services, leverage finance, namely, Leveraged buy outs and investments in financially distressed or underperforming companies; Securities derivatives trading; Financial services, namely, providing for the exchange of fixed income financial products; acceptance of wholesale financial deposits, equity research, equity capital investment, inter-dealer brokerage in the field of securities; securities arbitrage; financial services, namely, providing for the exchange of structured financial products, brokerage for trading of financial instruments and securities; and capital market investment services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |