USPTO serial 79037375
CRABSHACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROMAGHIM, PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRABSHACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Lisi
MICHAEL A. LISI HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP38500 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 100BLOOMFIELD HILL, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink, namely, catering of food and drinks, providing food and drinks for guests; providing temporary accommodation; café and coffee bar services; food and drink preparation services; food and drink takeaway services, namely take-away food and drink restaurants; restaurant services; fast-food restaurant services; canteen services; self-service restaurant services; snack-bars; restaurant and bar services, namely food and drink kiosk and food and drink take-away services; providing prepared meals, namely providing of food and drink for guests, serving of prepared food and drink; preparation of foodstuffs and meals for consumption on or off the premises | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 19, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2008 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |