USPTO serial 79037421
MARLY TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3476793Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARLY TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools and hand-operated implements, namely, sugar tongs, ice cube tongs; cutlery, forks and spoons; side arms, not including firearms, namely, hunting knives and swords; razors; silverware, namely, Sterling silver table forks, Sterling silver table knives, and Sterling silver table spoons; scissors; flatware, namely, cutlery, forks and spoons | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Gold and silver plated products made of precious metal and alloys thereof or plated therewith, namely, gold plated table forks, gold plated table knives, and gold plated table spoons; works of art of precious metal, plates, candle holders, wooden tea boxes and balls, coffee services, non-electric candelabras, candlesticks, smokers' ashtrays, cigar holders, cigar boxes, cigar cases, cigarette holders, cigarette boxes and cases, cigarette holders, key rings of precious metals; baskets for waste paper littering for household use, tie pins, tie clips; small jugs, kitchen containers of precious metal and not of precious metal, kitchen cooking utensils, namely, grills; candle extinguishers, figurines of precious metal, small bottles sold empty, mugs, cachepots, namely, ceramic pots, tankards, cruets, plastic hang tags, household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, cruet sets, purses, serving trays, egg cups, tea strainers, cooking sieves, meal trays, dishes, pepper pots, napkin holders, tobacco jars, wood powder boxes, alarm clocks; napkin rings, salad bowls, salt cellars, tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons, saucers, soup tureens, statues and statuettes of china, crystal, earthenware, glass, terra cotta, and porcelain, sugar bowls, Decorative paper table centerpieces, cups, tea services, tea pots, tumblers, vases; items of jewelry, namely, rings, earrings, bracelets, watch bands, charms, brooches, chains, hat ornaments not of precious metal, necklaces, medals, medallions and watches; jewelry, horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, mixing spoons; combs and bath sponges; sprinkling devices, namely, lawn sprinklers; non-paper cachepots, namely, flower pots; watering cans; glassware, porcelain, crystal ware, and earthenware, namely, plates, cups, saucers, dishes, serving trays for domestic purposes, soup tureens, pepper pots, sugar bowls, butter-dish covers; butter dishes; coffee services, drinking vessels; bowls; sweet boxes of precious metals, tea services, vases, drinking glasses; glass stoppers; candle holders, perfume burners; candlesticks, decorative crystals prisms; figurines and statuettes of porcelain, terra-cotta and glass; napkin holders, wooden powder boxes, napkin rings, cork screws; bottle openers; skewers for cooking; kitchen instruments, namely, chopsticks; knife rests for the table | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORFEVRERIE CHRISTOFLE
- Other trademarks owned by ORFEVRERIE CHRISTOFLE
- Other trademarks owned by ORFEVRERIE CHRISTOFLE
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MARLY TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |