Drawing for ANCOFER WALDRAM STEELPLATES

USPTO serial 79037424

ANCOFER WALDRAM STEELPLATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499269Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 9, 2008
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ANCOFER WALDRAM STEELPLATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas T. Johnson

Douglas T. Johnson Miller & Martin PLLC832 Georgia AvenueSuite 1200 Volunteer BuildingChattanooga, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006steel sheets; parts of steel sheets made by sawing, namely, steel in the form of plates, foils and coilsACTIVE—
035wholesale ordering services in the field of steel in sheet, plate, foil and coil form; information advisory and consultancy services relating to business administrationACTIVE—
042quality control for others to determine the quality of materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 14, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 9, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 27, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance