USPTO serial 79037429
AUTO GLYM CUSTOM WHEEL CLEANER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445449Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AUTO GLYM CUSTOM WHEEL CLEANER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Letchworth Garden City; Hertfordshire, GB
Letchworth Garden City; Hertfordshire, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark N. Mutterperl
Mark N. Mutterperl Zeisler PLLC40 Rockefeller Plaza - Floor 20New York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Automotive cleaning, polishing, rust-inhibiting, rust-removing and scouring preparations; abrasive preparations including creams, liquids and powders for automotive use only; shampoos for automotive use; soaps for automotive use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |