USPTO serial 79037443
SIERRA SENSORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3666849Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2009
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SIERRA SENSORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
20251 Hamburg, DE
Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG
DE
20251 Hamburg, DE
Hamburg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for scientific use, namely, reagents and materials in the nature of sensor consumables namely, proteins, oligoneucleotides, and chemical compounds and all reagents required for attaching and analyzing molecules onto the sensor consumables for use with analytical biosensors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, analytical instrumentation in the nature of analytical biosensor instruments, to perform biosensor analysis on molecular interactions; scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, consumable chips in the nature of functionalized and non-functionalized biosensor sensor chips for the use with scientific apparatus and instruments used to conduct biosensor analysis of molecular interactions and for use as parts of micro fluidics components being micro fluidic hardware used to manipulate sample fluids in the nature of proteins, peptides, oligoneucleotides, and chemical compounds, and used with analytical biosensor instrumentation; computer hardware and software used to operate biosensors, namely, for use in controlling instrument operation, biosensor data acquisition, data processing, and data analysis; computer hardware and software used to operate biosensors, namely, for use in the control of scientific apparatus and instruments being analytical instrumentation in the nature of analytical biosensor instruments used to perform a biosensor analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technical services, namely, development for others of product testing procedures and methods in the fields of biosensors and micro fluidics; scientific and technical services, namely, design for others of fluidics control systems in the fields of biosensors and micro fluidic; software development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bruker Daltonik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Sensors GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Sensors GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Sensors GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIERRA SENSORS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |