Drawing for MINIMAX

USPTO serial 79037456

MINIMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505461Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINIMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison R. Imber

Allison R. Imber Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.255 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1401Orlando, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic prostheses, namely, knee-, femoral-, acetabular- prostheses, and joints implantsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 23, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance