Drawing for µWAVE WIZARD

USPTO serial 79037473

µWAVE WIZARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3583480Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 3, 2009
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with µWAVE WIZARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software, namely, computer aided design programs for microwave componentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 14, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance