Drawing for FREE LIFE

USPTO serial 79037512

FREE LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREE LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers, bottles, vases, phials, glasses, cases for chocolate candies, cases for things of various kinds, biscuit cases, soup tureens, fruit dishes, cake and fruit salad sets, plates, scent bottles, candelabra, candlesticks, wedding souvenirs, statuettes, all made of crystal; lead crystal (glassware)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance