USPTO serial 79037527
INNOVINCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3508831Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVINCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-1311 RL ALMERE, NL
NL-1311 RL ALMERE, NL
NL-1311 RL ALMERE, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Koehler
STEVEN M KOEHLER WESTMAN CHAMPLIN & KELLY PA900 2ND AVE STE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software in the field of insurance services, namely, accounting software; administration software for use in the administration of insurance products; workflow management software; software for rating insurance; software for estimating and managing insurance claims; software for generating and providing quotations, software for reporting financial results; software for generating portfolio statements and overviews of client accounts and for performing the same functions over the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Database management and database processing in the field of insurance services; advice relating to database management and database processing in the field of insurance services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development and implementation of software for others, rental of computer hardware and software, rental of computer hardware and software via the Internet, implementation and maintenance of software on behalf of computer networks as part of network management, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems in connection with database management and database processing, advice in the field of implementation for others of software, implementation and maintenance of software on computer networks as part of network management, consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others, all the foregoing for others in the insurance field | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovinci Services B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovinci Services B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovinci Services B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INNOVINCI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |