Drawing for X10SURE

USPTO serial 79037533

X10SURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3715334Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2009
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X10SURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONFIGURING SERVERS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN IT CONSOLIDATION WITH RESPECT TO SYSTEM AVAILABILITYSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 2, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 18, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 1, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 24, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2009MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2009RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 24, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance