USPTO serial 79037557
PREKUNIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3378976Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PREKUNIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ginabeth B. Hutchison
GINABETH B. HUTCHISON ALSTON & BIRD LLP1201 W. PEACHTREE STREETATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medical preparations for use in the treatment of phenylketonuria | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |