Drawing for PIEGAVIVA

USPTO serial 79037562

PIEGAVIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3440961Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 3, 2008
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PIEGAVIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francesco Braga

Francesco Braga Perani & Partners S.p.A.Piazza Armando Diaz 7Milano,ITALY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Bleaching preparations and detergent for laundry use; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive liquids and powders; ] [ soaps; ][ perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, ] hair lotions [ ; dentifrices ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 28, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 16, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 16, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 3, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance