Drawing for SPOTIFY

USPTO serial 79037569

SPOTIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564798Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPOTIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Slafsky

John L. Slafsky Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati650 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computer software for use in the delivery, distribution and transmission of digital music and entertainment-related audio, video, text and multimedia content; computer software for enabling transmission, storage, sharing, collection, editing, organizing and modifying audio, video, messages, images and other data for use in social networking, online chats and interactive gaming, for use in creating social networking databases and for use in social networking database management; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data for peer-to-peer social networking databases; pre-recorded CDs featuring music ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035[ Providing advertising space on the Internet ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Sound and television broadcasting of music and films via the Internet, telephony, [ or satellite broadcasting; providing on-line chat rooms and discussion forums for transmission of messages and digital pictures among users in the field of general interest; ] telecommunications on the Internet, namely, audio and video transmissionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment, namely, providing music, film [ and gaming ] to users online via a communication network [ ; providing an online database via a communication network featuring music, films, online gaming and entertainment data; music production; providing online computer games; rental of films, video and computer games and music via a communication network ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 8, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 23, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 23, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 24, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 20, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 3, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 15, 2016RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 3, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 19, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 3, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 27, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2012CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 30, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance