Drawing for G GONG

USPTO serial 79037570

G GONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3598581Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 31, 2009
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G GONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN T. SHELTON

Steven T. Shelton Shelton IP75 South Broadway, Suite 400White Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Downloadable computer screen savers; pre-recorded dvds and video tapes featuring animated videos; mouse pads; covers for mobile phones and hand-held personal electronics ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016[ Books in the field of Japanese style animation; magazines in the field of Japanese style animation; comic books, pens and stationery ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Transmission and broadcasting of Japanese style animation (anime), movies, TV and video clipsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040[ Digital compression of video files for distribution over the internet ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Distribution of Japanese style animation (anime) in the form of movies and television programs; production of animated cartoons; production of Japanese style animation (anime); production of films, videos, DVDs, computer games and television programs; production of Japanese style animation (anime) and animated programs for use on TV, cable, mobile phones, PDAs, websites and computers; production of art work for animated filmsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Licensing of film production; licensing of Japanese style animation (anime); licensing of animationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 6, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 1, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 1, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 17, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 2, 2016INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 17, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 8, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 7, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 31, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 28, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 8, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance