Drawing for Serial No. 79037573

USPTO serial 79037573

Serial No. 79037573

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79037573?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Baxley, Esquire

Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John StreetSuite 309New York, NY 10038

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Luggage and bags, namely, traveling bags, backpacks, handbags, belts bags, haversacks, shoe bags, bags for climbers, school bags, wheeled bags, tool bags sold empty, garment bags for travel, all these bags made of leather, imitation leather or cloth; straps of leather, change purses sold empty, not of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Footwear, namely, boots, trekking boots, light trekking boots, mountaineering boots, tennis shoes, cycling shoes and leisure shoes; ski and after-ski boots; surfing shoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
026Bodkins and cords for clothingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 7, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 1, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 31, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance