Drawing for IB VOGT

USPTO serial 79037765

IB VOGT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3418636Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2008
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IB VOGT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP630 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Factory construction; overall supervision of construction work for building of manufacturing facilitiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Overall supervision of planning activities, namely, planning of buildings and infrastructure systems for buildings and fabrication facilities for the manufacture of solar cells and wafers; technical project planning related to the individual planning providers and subcontractors as required for the planning of manufacturing facilities, namely, the planning of manufacturing facilities and infrastructure systems for manufacturing facilities and layout planning for production lines; engineering services provided for planning of manufacturing facilities; industrial design services for the planning of manufacturing facilities; computing consultancy; computer system analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 31, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 5, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance