USPTO serial 79037773
BETAFROST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373348Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETAFROST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-1001 Copenhagen K, DK
DK-1001 Copenhagen K, DK
DK-1001 Copenhagen K, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor Moskowitz
Simor Moskowitz Jacobson Holman PLLC400 Seventh Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Betaine for industrial use; betaine for de-icing, anti-icing and defrosting; de-icing, anti-icing and defrosting in solid and fluid form for industrial, commercial and domestic use on roads, driveways, paths, sidewalks and parking areas | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |