CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for X FUSE

USPTO serial 79037782

X FUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3431507Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 20, 2008
Examiner
BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with X FUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS M. PALISI

THOMAS M. PALISI LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP20 Commerce DriveCranford, NJ 07016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic joint implants; surgical implants comprising artificial material, namely, arthrodesis and osteosynthesis implants, especially for hands and feet; surgical implants comprising artificial material, namely, intra-medullary implantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2022C.7CNEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Jun 10, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2021ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 13, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 20, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 11, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 21, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 26, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 4, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 4, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 10, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance