Drawing for FACES

USPTO serial 79037783

FACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy F. Divino

Amy F. Divino Wolf Block Schorr & Solis-Cohen LLP250 Park AvenueSuite 1000New York, NY 10177

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools and hand operated implements, namely, non-electric can openers, oyster openers, bottle and tin can openers, sharpeners, serving tongs, meat mincers, vegetable mincers, vegetable cutters, nutcrackers not of precious metal, non-electric pizza cutters, non-electric egg-cutting machines, namely, slicers and graters for cutting and chopping eggs, non-electric cheese-cutting machines, namely, slicers and graters for cutting and grating cheese, graters, scissors, knives, forks and spoonsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Oil cruets, not of precious metal, cocktail shakers, non-precious metal plates and trays, corkscrews, bowls, skewers for kitchen use, toothpicks, butter dishes, kitchen graters, salt cellars, cruet stands, drinking glassesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 7, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 6, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance