Drawing for CLEANCOIL

USPTO serial 79037788

CLEANCOIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3431508Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 20, 2008
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CLEANCOIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Parts of textile machines, namely, mechanical devices on textile material processing machines for storing or placing textile slivers or fibre bands in spinning cans; ] parts of textile machines, namely, sliver coilers for depositing slivers or fibre bands into spinning cansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 9, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 16, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 16, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 16, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 30, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance