USPTO serial 79037797
GRAND DEFNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAND DEFNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned processed olives, preserved, dried and cooked olives, olive pastes, pickles; milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; cheese, namely, cream cheese, white cheese, feta cheese, kasseri cheese; yogurt, yogurt with fruits, ayran (beverage based on yoghurt), clotted cream, cream, milk powder, kefir, milk predominating milk beverages, milk beverages containing fruits, koumiss milk beverages, milk or dairy predominating desserts, black pudding (blood sausage) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Condiments, namely vinegar, flavourings of lemons, sauces, tomato sauce, salad dressings, mayonnaise, ketchup, mustard, spices, candies, halvah, Turkish delight, frozen yoghurt (confectionery ices), chocolates, chocolate products, namely chocolate chips, chocolate truffles, chocolate candies, chocolate bars, products coated with chocolate or candy, namely chocolate covered nuts, chocolate and confectionery products as ornaments for Christmas trees, chocolate-based beverages not being dairy based or vegetable based, rice, pounded wheat, keskek (a dish cooked with pounded wheat), somen noodles (very thin wheat noodle, uncooked), malt for food purposes, cereal-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, processed cereals, popcorn, corn flakes, oatmeal, breakfast cereals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |