USPTO serial 79037885
GORMAN. ORGANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GORMAN. ORGANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of clothing for women, namely suits, dresses, jackets, coats, skirts, shorts, blouses, T-shirts, sweatshirts, vests, cardigans, jumpers, slacks pants, jeans, leggings, camisoles, jumpsuits, bathing suits, socks, belts, gloves, scarves, hats and caps, boots, shoes, sandals and slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |