Drawing for LASER CUT HIGH PRECISION EDGING

USPTO serial 79037890

LASER CUT HIGH PRECISION EDGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASER CUT HIGH PRECISION EDGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials (non metallic), particularly semi-worked wood, wooden joints, wooden planks and panels, wainscoting (not of metal), parquet flooring and parquet floor boards, including laminated parquet flooring and parquet floor boardsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
027Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials for covering existing floors; wall hangings (non-textile)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 22, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 12, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 14, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance