USPTO serial 79037893
MONSTER BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONSTER BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby clothing, namely, baby bottoms, baby tops, baby bodysuits, baby hats and baby trousers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 7, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 5, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |