USPTO serial 79037903
EASYCLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 19, 2010
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EASYCLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC
Kalamazoo, MI
FR
FR
FR
FR
STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS V, LLC
Kalamazoo, MI
Stryker European Holdings III, LLC
US
Other trademarks owned by Stryker European Holdings III, LLC
STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS IV, LLC
US
US
STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
Carrigtwohill, County Cork, IE
Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. PALISI
THOMAS M. PALISI Lerner, David, Littenberg, et al.20 Commerce DriveCranford, NJ 07016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical staples, in particular internal fixation compression staples for hand and foot surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MEMOMETAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by MEMOMETAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by MEMOMETAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by MEMOMETAL TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS V, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Stryker European Holdings III, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS IV, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Stryker European Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EASYCLIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2022 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |