Drawing for PROTECT GUARD

USPTO serial 79037923

PROTECT GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTECT GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical impregnation and coating products for protection and/or waterproofing of surfaces made of all types of materials and especially for floors, for textile articles especially carpets and rugs of all types, curtains, for goods made of leather and imitation leather, for furniture and furnishing articles; products for protection against stainsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance