Drawing for PHILODERM BY ROFIL

USPTO serial 79037976

PHILODERM BY ROFIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHILODERM BY ROFIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

John Alumit Patel & Alumit, PC16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, eye creams, eye serum, day creams, non-medicated treatment cream for scars, non-medicated anti-acne cream and anti-acne masks, face-cleansing creams, moisturizing creams, non-medicated peels; anti-wrinkle plastersABANDONED—
005Collagen-based pharmaceutical products, namely, collagen-based pharmaceuticals for the treatment and restoration of skin; chemical products and products for treating wrinkles, skin defects and skin anomalies, namely, medicated peels and creams, pharmaceutical solutions for the treatment of wrinkles; concentrates and emulsions of vitamins for cosmetic purposes; emulsions and concentrates of vitamins for cosmetic useABANDONED—
010Syringes for injections; implants for surgical use comprising artificial materialABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 27, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance