USPTO serial 79038010
PAPAGALLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAPAGALLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILFRIED FLEIDL
David A. Wilson8514 Countrybrooke WayLutherville, MD 21093-4766UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, and non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers, namely, aperitif wines, aperitifs with a wine base, alcoholic aperitif bitters, alcoholic beverages of fruit, alcoholic bitters, alcoholic cocktail mixes, aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor base, and prepared alcoholic cocktail | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |