Drawing for GR8

USPTO serial 79038015

GR8

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GR8?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Cleaning preparations; cleansing preparations; soaps; cosmetics; lotions for application to the skin or hair; creams for application to the skin or hairSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Medicated preparations for application to the skin and hair; medicated lotions; medicated creams; antiseptics; disinfectants; pharmaceutical preparations and substancesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 30, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance