Drawing for CETA

USPTO serial 79038061

CETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587222Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
PRATER, JILL I
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Watering devices and apparatus for watering, namely, garden hose sprayers and grass sprinklersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 30, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 5, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 3, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Aug 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance