Drawing for SOLER A NATURAL QUALITY PRODUCT

USPTO serial 79038187

SOLER A NATURAL QUALITY PRODUCT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564803Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLER A NATURAL QUALITY PRODUCT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Charcoal, charcoal briquettes for kindling, kindling wood firelightersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
006Metal containers, known as braziers, for preparing embers of charcoal or charcoal briquettes for barbecuesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011BarbecuesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Cleaning equipment, namely, cleaning rags, cleaning cloths, cleaning pads, cleaning brushes for cleaning barbecue grills, wire brushes for cleaning and not being machine parts, and steel wool for cleaningSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 12, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 21, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 21, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance